矽基互補金屬氧化物半導體(CMOS)晶體管已經很難再繼續縮小下去,碳納米管是替代矽的候選納米材料之一,碳納米管晶體管的主要技術挑戰過去幾年已被陸續得到解決。中國北京大學的科學家開發出柵長5納米的碳納米管場效應晶體管,聲稱其性能超過相同尺寸的矽晶體管。他們的研究報告發表在今天出版的《科學》期刊上。
研究人員報告,碳納米管晶體管比矽基晶體管操作速度更快,工作電壓更低。
論文通訊作者Lian-Mao Peng稱,碳納米管晶體管的柵電容更小,即使矽基設備縮小到碳納米管設備相同尺寸,後者的開關速度仍然更快。 10納米碳納米管CMOS柵電容導致的延遲大約為70飛秒,僅為英特爾14納米矽基CMOS的三分之一。
Peng預測,碳納米管電子產品有很好的機會到2022年取代矽基CMOS。
The end appears nigh for scaling down silicon-based complimentary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) transistors, with some experts seeing the cutoff date as early as 2020.
While carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have long been among the nanomaterials investigated to serve as replacement for silicon in CMOS field-effect transistors (FETs) in a post-silicon future, they have always been bogged down by some frustrating technical problems. But, with some of the main technical showstoppers having been largely addressed—like sorting between metallic and semiconducting carbon nanotubes—the stage has been set for CNTs to start making their presence felt a bit more urgently in the chip industry.
Peking University scientists in China have now developed carbon nanotube field-effect transistors (CNT FETs) having a critical dimension—the gate length—of just five nanometers that would outperform silicon-based CMOS FETs at the same scale. The researchers claim in the journal Science that this marks the first time that sub-10 nanometer CNT CMOS FETs have been reported.
More importantly than just being the first, the Peking group showed that their CNT-based FETs can operate faster and at a lower supply voltage than their silicon-based counterparts.
At a 0.4-V supply voltage the current that flows through the CNT transistor is larger than what you’d get from the best silicon CMOS transistors at 0.7 V supply voltage, according to Peking University’s Lian-Mao Peng in an e-mail interview with IEEE Spectrum. (The “best” according to Peng is Intel’s 14-nm node CMOS.) Because the gate’s capacitance is smaller for a carbon nanotube transistor, even if the silicon devices were scaled down to the size of the CNT device, the latter would still switch faster, he says. The intrinsic delay caused by the gate capacitance for 10-nm CNT CMOS is about 70 femtoseconds, says Peng. That’s just 1/3rd of the value (220 fs) of 14-nm silicon CMOS.
As with all the field-effect transistors, current flows through a channel between the source and drain under the control of voltage at the gate. In the Peking design, the channel through which the carriers move is made out of a single carbon nanotube and the source and drain are both graphene. This CNT channel is either p -type—conducting positive charge carriers, or holes—or n -type, which use electrons. It is this combination of the p-type and n-type devices that constitutes the “complementary” of CMOS and keeps power consumption low when switching logic states.
Unlike most carbon-based and two-dimensional devices, the CNT FETs the Chinese researchers have developed are not “back gated”. Back-gated devices—in which the gate electrode lies beneath a layer of insulation and the nanotube lies atop the insulation—are generally more difficult to integrate into complicated circuits.
Instead, the device Peng and colleagues constructed uses a gate that drapes over the top of the carbon nanotube channel. “Top-gated FETs can provide higher gate efficiency than the back-gated devices since the CNT is almost surrounded by the top gate,” says Peng. “Also, top-gated FETs provide better stability than back-gated devices since the CNT channel is protected from influences of the outside world by the top gate.”
While the researchers concede that the use of individual single-walled carbon nanotubes to construct their devices is not suitable for producing large-scale integrated circuits, they are confident they can overcome this without changing much.
“Now that we have confirmed the potential of CNT CMOS transistors in the work, we can construct CMOS FETs with similar performance on aligned CNT arrays with high density and high semiconducting purity using the same fabrication process.”
With the ability to scale down silicon CMOS petering out in the coming years, there is some question whether there is enough time to replace silicon, or whether it is even worth the effort.
“We believe CNT electronics have a good chance to replace [silicon] CMOS technology at 5-nm nodes by 2022,” says Peng. As optimistic as Peng is, he remains cautious about the engineering challenges that they still face.
“While we can use the currently available CNTs… to fabricate large scale CNT ICs, it still requires one to two years to get the ideal CNT form for ICs,” he says. Nonetheless, Peng believes that they will be able to make wafers full of ICs in the next few years using their process.
Source:IEEE
留言列表